“Even this document does not tend to confer any right
or title in favour of respondent No.1, except the right to
possession, therefore, merely on the basis of extracts
containing entries in his favour in PT-I maintained by
Excise and Taxation Officer M. Division Karachi could
not be held to be the owner of the property. At best the
plaintiff/respondent No.1 would be entitled to a decree
for protection of possession on the basis of the
evidence adduced by him and not controverted by
other side. In the absence of any concrete evidence on
the question of mesne profits we are in a manner of
doubt whether such decree could be passed in his
favour as against petitioner and respondent Rehmat
Hussain.”
2007 SCMR 181
Used in Judgment of:
Lahore High Court
Civil Revision
35042/19
0 comments:
Post a Comment