Revision petition after objection of incompletion of the file by the Office was returned to the petitioners to re-file it within three days but it was re-filed after sixty days without any plausible reason,

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that the revision petition after objection of incompletion of the file by the Office was returned to the petitioners to re-file it within three days but it was re-filed after sixty days without any plausible reason, therefore, it was badly barred by time. He points out that the only objection raised by the Office was regarding incompletion of the petition and no objection of preparation of paper books is reflected from the objection memo, therefore, it is nothing but an afterthought. He has relied upon the law laid down in cases Asif Ali Shah v. The Superintending Engineer, Quetta Circle, Quetta and another (PLD 1963 SC 263), Sultan Muhammad v. Muhammad Ashraf and 4 others (1991 CLC 269 Lahore), Naheed Ahmad v. Asif Riaz and 3 others (PLD 1996 Lahore 702), Muhammad Ahmad v. Muhammad Ali and another (PLD 1996 Lahore 158), Lahore Development Authority v. Muhammad Rashid (1997 SCMR 1224), Mst. Sabiran Bi v. Ahmad Khan and another (2000 SCMR 847) and Safdar Ali and 5 others v. Defence Housing Authority through Secretary and other (2011 YLR 1809 Lahore).

Part Of Judgment
Lahore High Court
Civil Revision
214918/18
2018 LHC 1092