Suffice to state here that the requirements of Article 10-A of the Constitution eclipse all such arguments. The Chancellor may be reminded of the very famous quote about, “history being replete with cases which were touted to be open and shut but which when came to be argued turned out to be totally different (Megarry J. 1974) or that it is an acknowledged and pronounced facet of any judicial system that an oral hearing is the most powerful force to promote a change of mind by the adjudicator! and that the duty to hear being inextricably linked with the exercise of power under section 11-A Bahauddin Zakariya University ACT 1975, it cannot be dispensed with.
W.P. No. 18802 of 2019 Rashid Iqbal Versus Chancellor, etc.
0 Comments