Words and phrases ---
Writ Petitions Nos . 5324 , 5343 , 5055 and 6545 of 2023
ASHFAQ AHMAD KHARAL and 21 others versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary , Law and Parliamentary Affairs and others
PLD 2024 Lahore 129
Advocate General and other law officers --- Appointment and removal --- Care-taker government , jurisdiction of --- Scope --- Discrimination --- Dispute was with regard to removal of Advocate General and other Law Officers by Care-taker government of Punjab province on the plea of political affiliation with outgoing political party --- Validity --- Appointment of Advocate General is a substantial appointment and otherwise falls in the realm of major policy decision --- Simplicitor removal of Advocate General on the allegation of having political affiliation / association - solely because appointed by elected Provincial Government plausible justification and reasoning and without seeking indulgence of - and without any Election Commission , per se violated mandate of S. 230 (1) (d) of Elections Act , 2017 --- Such action could not otherwise be construed as an impartial act to a political party --- Segregation so made had no basis in law and in fact stigmatized excluded Law Officers , risking their chances of seeking appointment in the office , by dint of their competency and merits --- This was discrimination and did not meet test of reasonable classification --- Excluding nineteen (19) Law Officers contravened the Constitutional mandate and had rendered effect of Art . 140 (2) of the Constitution ineffectual , which prescribed scope of duties for Advocate General --- High Court directed Care-taker Provincial Government to operate and function within the ambit of S. 230 of the Elections Act , 2017 and set aside appointment of fresh Law Officers
Care-taker government --- Object , purpose and scope --- Care-taker Government is a government temporarily in power until election is held --- It is a temporary Government commissioned by Governor General or State Governor , usually for short period until stable Government can be formed --- Care-taker governments are established during the time of uncertainty when it is not clear whether any party or coalition of parties is capable of forming a stable government --- Care taker governments carry on routine business of government but they are expected to refrain from making important policy decisions .
Writ Petitions Nos . 5324 , 5343 , 5055 and 6545 of 2023
ASHFAQ AHMAD KHARAL and 21 others versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary , Law and Parliamentary Affairs and others
PLD 2024 Lahore 129
Advocate General --- Appointment and functions - Dispute was with regard to removal of Advocate General of Punjab Government along with Law Officers working there by Care - taker government --- Held , that dispensing with displeasure of service of Law Officers is not to be necessary based upon the Governor --- Sole purpose of Care - taker government is to conduct fair and free elections --- If Care - taker government was of the view that such Law Officers were not helpful in creating impression of impartiality in the mind of public , their services could be dispensed with --- This was objective decision of Care - taker Chief Executive --- High Court upheld the notification for removal of Advocate General Punjab and other law officers --- High Court set aside notification for appointment of such new Law Officers to the extent of Law Officers who retained their offices in the political government immediately preceding the last government
Interpretation of statutes --
-Maxim " Leges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant " -Applicability
Advocate General and Law Officers --- Appointment and removal --- Counsel and client relationship --- Distinction --- Chief Minister is Competent Authority for appointment and removal of Advocate General , Additional and Assistant Advocates General under the Constitution , Rules of Business and Punjab Law Department Manual --- Law Officers cannot be treated at par with government employees or public servants compelling Government to retain a particular counsel irrespective of lack of faith and confidence on said Law Officers by the Government .

0 Comments