Civil Judge had rightly rejected the application under Order VII rule 11 CPC

In “Tariq Mehmood Chaudhry Kamboh v. Najam Un Din” (1999 SCMR 2396), it was observed by the August Supreme Court as follows:

“…After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents who appeared in person, we are of the view that the learned Civil Judge had already framed issue No.2 to the effect that the suit was within time and besides that the learned Civil Judge also gave finding that the question of limitation in the case was a mixed question of law and fact and thus the issue can only be resolved after recording of evidence touching the controversy. In our view, no error had been committed either by the learned Civil Judge or the High Court while arriving at the aforesaid finding and thus the learned Civil Judge had rightly rejected the application under Order VII rule 11 CPC and the High Court also correctly upheld the said order”

Used in Judgment of
Lahore High Court
Civil Original Suit (C.O.S)
1343554.643-12
2019 LHC 1410

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.

Case Law Search