The additional setback of the controversy would be that the
alleged donor had five sons and two daughters or their siblings, if
any out of them had already departed, but no reason was ever
furnished either in the memo of gift or record of the Society that for
what evil deeds rest of the sons as well as daughters were deprived
of the said benefit. See Sadar Abbas Vs. Province of Punjab and
others (2015 CLC 822) and Barkat Ali through Legal Heirs and others
Vs. Muhammad Ismail through Legal Heirs and others (2002 SCMR
1938). The apropos of entire discussion is that beneficiaries failed to
discharge onus of issue No.5 duly shifted upon them and this Court
being sanguine to unanimous findings returned by the Courts below
feels no hesitation to confirm it.
Part of Judgment
Lahore High court
Civil Revision
1759717.546-15
2018 LHC 2949
0 comments:
Post a Comment