When there appears no misreading and nonreading of evidence,

6. Pursuant to the above discussion, both the learned Courts have rightly evaluated evidence on record and have reached to a just conclusion, concurrently, that the plaintiffs/ respondents are entitled to inherit the land owned by Muhammad Shah deceased and when there appears no misreading and nonreading of evidence, the concurrent findings on facts, howsoever erroneous, cannot be interfered with as has been held in judgments reported as Muhammad Farid Khan v. Muhammad Ibrahim, etc. (2017 SCMR 679), Mst. Zaitoon Begum v. Nazar Hussain and another (2014 SCMR 1469) and CANTONMENT BOARD through Executive Officer, Cantt. Board Rawalpindi v. IKHLAQ AHMED and others (2014 SCMR 161).

Part of Judgement of
Lahore High Court
Civil Revision
1047369.1505-09
2018 LHC 1404