3. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia submits that the
civil revision was filed within time on 21.03.2018 but the Office
raised objection thereupon and returned the same to the petitioners
and compelled the petitioners to prepare Paper Books in which a lot of
time was consumed and after doing the needful, the civil revision was
re-filed on 25.05.2018. He contends that since the revision petition
was filed within time, the same could not be treated as barred by time
even if filed beyond the prescribed time limit. He argues that even if there is any technical flaw in the revision petition or it is barred by
time, the same could not deprive the revisional court of its corrective
and supervisory jurisdiction. In support of his arguments, he has relied
upon the law laid down in cases Mst. Sabira Bi v. Ahmed Khan and
another (2000 SCMR 847), Muhammad Boota v. Bsharat Ali (PLD
2014 Lahore 1), Mst. Banori v. Jilani (deceased) through LRs etc.
(PLJ 2011 SC 895), Farman Ali v. Muhammad Ishaq and others
(PLD 2013 SC 392) and Hafeez Ahmad and others v. Civil Judge,
Lahore and others (PLD 2012 SC 400).
Part Of Judgment
Lahore High Court
Civil Revision
214918/18
2018 LHC 1092
0 comments:
Post a Comment