Header Ads Widget

غیر رجسٹرڈ دستاویز کی بنیاد پر مخصوص ریلیف ایکٹ 1877 کے S. 42 کے تحت ڈیکلریشن کا دعویٰ نہ تو جائز ہے اور نہ ہی قابل عمل ہے۔

2024 M L D 90
Declaration of title --- Unregistered deed --- Effect --- Unregistered document neither creates any title nor right or interest in suit property as envisaged in S. 49 of Specific Relief Act , 1877 --- Suit for declaration under S. 42 of Specific Relief Act , 1877 on the basis of such document is neither permissible nor maintainable .

Agreement --- Proof --- Non - production of required number of marginal witnesses is non - compliance of mandatory provision of law which is fatal .

Unregistered document --- Exchange deed --- Proof --- Appellants / defendants were aggrieved of judgments and decrees passed by Trial Court and Lower Appellate Court declaring respondents / plaintiffs as owner of suit land --- Validity --- Unregistered deed of exchange comprising immovable property of value of more than Rupees 100 / - per se was not admissible in evidence --- Exchange deed was not a registered document , whereas under S. 17 of Registration Act , 1908 , it was compulsorily , registerable document and without its registration , it could not be considered as a valid document --- Suit for declaration on the basis of unregistered exchange deed was barred under S. 42 of Specific Relief Act , 1877 --- Respondents / plaintiffs did not produce marginal witnesses of exchange deed to negate execution of same without advancing any trustworthy reason in such regard --- Such flaw amounted to withholding of best evidence and presumption under Art . 129 ( g ) of Qanun - e - Shahadat , 1984 operated against respondents / plaintiffs --- No land was transferred in favor of predecessor - in - interest of appellants / defendant by predecessor - in - interest of respondents / plaintiffs , nor any document was produced by respondents / plaintiffs in such regard therefore , exchange of property in favour of predecessor - in - interest of respondents / plaintiffs was not proved --- High Court in exercise of appellate jurisdiction set aside judgments and decrees passed by two Courts below as the same suffered from misreading and non - reading of evidence as well as misapplication of law and suit filed by respondents / plaintiffs was dismissed.
Khalid Mehmood v . Sardaran Bibi
2024 M L D 90

Khalid Mehmood v . Sardaran Bibi 

Post a Comment

0 Comments

close