PLD 2024 SUPREME COURT 672
There is a prevalent and concerning trend of frequent adjournment requests in lower courts, which amounts to an abuse of the process of the court. This practice has significantly contributed to a substantial backlog of litigation in the lower judiciary. It is imperative that we actively discourage this behavior to ensure the prompt delivery of justice to the citizens of Pakistan. By curbing the routine use of adjournments, we can expedite legal proceedings, alleviate the burden on the lower judiciary, and ultimately enhance the efficiency of the judicial system. This, in turn, will contribute to a more timely and effective resolution of legal matters, promoting access to justice for all.
It is imperative for the court to exercise vigilance and refrain from granting adjournments so liberally and without any compelling reasons. Such a cautious approach is necessary to prevent abuse of the legal system, ensure a fair and timely resolution of cases, and optimize the use of judicial resources. In this regard, the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ("C.P.C.") under Order XVII, Rule 3, empowers the court to proceed to decide the suit forthwith if a party, to whom time has been granted, fails to produce evidence, secure the attendance of witnesses, or perform any other act necessary for the further progress of the suit.
It is relevant to observe here that when the last opportunity to produce evidence is granted and the party has been duly warned of the consequences, the court must execute its order consistently and strongly, without exceptions. Such a measure would not only realign the system and reaffirm the authority of the law but also curb the trend of seeking multiple adjournments on frivolous grounds, which serve to needlessly prolong and delay proceedings without valid or legitimate justification. Moreover, when the court issues an order providing the final chance, it not only issues a judicial order but also extends a commitment to the parties that no further adjournments will be permitted for any reason. The court must stand by its order and uphold its commitment, leaving no room or option for any alternative action.
Against Interim Order/Others
C.P.920-P/2023 Duniya Gul and another v. Niaz Muhammad and others
0 Comments