6. The next argument of learned counsel for the beneficiaries that
suits were badly time barred having been filed after many years of
the departure of Maula Bakhsh is also not forceful. In the present
case, perspicuous stance of the plaintiffs was that the impugned
memos of gift were fictitious, forged as well as fabricated and on
having been proved as such beyond any shadow of doubt, the same
could not be perpetuated, but those can be assailed at any point of
time. Reliance in this respect can be placed on the case law reported
as Abdul Rahim and another Vs. Mrs. Jannatay Bibi and 13 others
(2000 SCMR 346) and Khair Din Vs. Mst. Salaman and others (PLD
2002 SC 677).
Part of Judgment
Lahore High court
Civil Revision
1759717.546-15
2018 LHC 2949
0 comments:
Post a Comment