15. In “Fida Hussain through Legal Heirs
Muhammad Taqi Khan and others. v. Murid Sakina” (2004 SCMR 1043) it was observed by the August
Supreme Court that “it is known principle of law
that a mutation is not a deed of title and is merely
inductive of some previous oral sale between the
parties. This principle being in view, whenever any
mutation is challenged, the burden squarely lies on
the beneficiary of the mutation to prove not only the
mutation but also the original transaction which he is
acquired to fall back upon”. Similar view was taken
in “Abdur Rasheed through L.Rs and others v.
Manzoor Ahmad and others” (PLD 2007 SC 287)
Part of Judgment
Lahore High court
Civil Revision
2504305.125-17
2018 LHC 3528
0 comments:
Post a Comment