Case cannot be made basis to reverse unanimous impugned judgments,

8. Learned counsel for the beneficiaries while relying upon judgments reported as Yasmeen Qureshi Vs.Tariq Qureshi and 2 others (PLD 2006 Lahore 311), Mehbub Alim Vs. Razia Begum and others (PLD 1949 Lahore 263), Syed Mehdi Hussain Shah Vs. Mst. Sahadoo Bibi and others (PLD 1962 SC 291), Muhammad Sharif and 2 others Vs. Mst. Aisha Bibi (1994 MLD 677), Chanar Gul and 4 others Vs. Province of Sindh through Secretary, Sindh Secretariat and 3 others (2017 YLR Note 434), Murad Bakhsh and 4 others Vs. Mst. Syeda Ashraf Jhan and 4 others (2017 CLC 646), Chandu Lal Agarwala and others Vs. Khalil ur Rehman and others (PLD 1949 Privy Council 239), Muhammad Akbar and others Vs. Mst. Sahib Khatoon and others (1991 SCMR 1196) and Rashid Ahmed and others Vs. Allah Ditta and others (2014 YLR 1748) put their best to persuade that concurrent findings of two Courts below were liable to be interfered with, but minute perusal of the referred case law reveals that these being distinguishable from the facts and circumstances of the instant case cannot be made basis to reverse unanimous impugned judgments, which having been based upon well appreciation of evidence and application of law on the subject are approved and confirmed.

Part of Judgment
Lahore High court
Civil Revision
1759717.546-15

2018 LHC 2949