3. On the contrary, learned counsels for the
respondents have argued that suit of the petitioners has rightly
been dismissed by the learned appellate Court, because they had
no right to claim declaration in absence of prayer for
possession, as such the suit was incompetent. They have
supported the impugned judgment and decree and have prayed
for dismissal of the civil revision in hand. Reliance has been
placed on Dilmir v. Ghulam Muhammad and 2 others (PLD
2002 Supreme Court 403) and Ali Muhammad and another v.
Muhammad Bashir and another (2012 SCMR 930).
Part of Judgment
Lahore High court
Civil Revision
1250088.1744-11
2018 LHC 2340
0 comments:
Post a Comment