Submitted that under section 151 CPC, the court had ample powers to revisit any mistake or error. It was also submitted that it is trite law that no limitation runs against a void order

 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.1, inter alia, contended that judgment and decree passed by learned trial court on 10.04.1987 was void and nullity in light of law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in case reported as ‘Government of NWFP through Secretary Law Department Vs. Malik Said Kamal Shah’ (PLD 1986 Supreme Court 360). It was submitted that under section 151 CPC, the court had ample powers to revisit any mistake or error. It was also submitted that it is trite law that no limitation runs against a void order. Reliance was also placed on cases reported as ‘Darvesh Ali Vs. Munir Khan and Others’ (2001 CLC 1431), ‘Mst. Fehmida Khatoon Vs. Additional Deputy Commissioner (Consolidation), Lahore and Another’ (PLD 1975 Lahore 942), ‘Mst. Zaira Khatoon Vs. Mst. Kishwar Jamal’ (2009 MLD 67), ‘Ghulam Hamdani Vs. Muhammad Iqbal and 9-others’ (1991 SCMR 1668) and ‘Allah Ditta Vs. Mst. Khurshid Bibi’ (1995 SCMR 1203).

Part Of Judgment 

IN THE ISLAMABAD HIGH COURT, ISLAMABAD. 

Syed Altaf Hussain Shah, etc VS Multi Professional Cooperative Housing Society, etc..(Adv: Shakir ur Rehman Khan)

Civil Revision-204-2014 | 2020 CLC 1119

Honourable Mr. Justice Aamer Farooq