Insofar as the power of the trial court in the summary suit under Order XXXVII, CPC to summon any person for production of document is concerned, it is pertinent to note that for grant of leave to appear and defend the suit under Order XXXVII, CPC, the court is to satisfy itself that the defendant has taken defence to claim on merits raising triable issue indicating that he has fair, bona fide and reasonable defence and if the defendant has no defence or the defence is sham or illusory, the defendant is not entitled to such leave by the court. During this process, it is the satisfaction of the court which is important. In order to satisfy itself to the contents of leave to appear and defend, the court is required not to act in a mechanical manner. Instead the trial court has to apply its judicial mind to the contents of the application for leave to appear and defend. The trial court is not debarred to probe and conduct such an inquiry so as to satisfy itself as to the genuineness and plausibility of the defence of the defendant. For this purpose, as discussed hereinabove, the plaintiff in such suits is not debarred to move an application for summoning a document in custody of any person, which prima facie establishes before the court that the defence taken in the application for leave to appear in the summary suit is sham and illusory, which is precisely the case in the matter in hand.
Menu
About
Blog Archive
- May 2024 (19)
- April 2024 (31)
- March 2024 (35)
- February 2024 (31)
- January 2024 (32)
- December 2023 (33)
- November 2023 (31)
- October 2023 (31)
- September 2023 (30)
- August 2023 (31)
- July 2023 (31)
- June 2023 (29)
- May 2023 (27)
- April 2023 (52)
- March 2023 (62)
- February 2023 (56)
- January 2023 (53)
- December 2022 (37)
- November 2022 (30)
- October 2022 (30)
- September 2022 (31)
- August 2022 (33)
- July 2022 (30)
- June 2022 (28)
- May 2022 (29)
- April 2022 (29)
- March 2022 (31)
- February 2022 (28)
- January 2022 (31)
- December 2021 (31)
- November 2021 (27)
- October 2021 (31)
- September 2021 (30)
- August 2021 (32)
- July 2021 (31)
- June 2021 (29)
- May 2021 (29)
- April 2021 (29)
- March 2021 (31)
- February 2021 (28)
- January 2021 (33)
- December 2020 (32)
- November 2020 (31)
- October 2020 (31)
- September 2020 (30)
- August 2020 (27)
- July 2020 (31)
- June 2020 (30)
- May 2020 (28)
- April 2020 (31)
- March 2020 (32)
- February 2020 (17)
- January 2020 (15)
- December 2019 (17)
- November 2019 (16)
- October 2019 (15)
- September 2019 (15)
- August 2019 (15)
- July 2019 (17)
- June 2019 (12)
- May 2019 (15)
- April 2019 (5)
Popular Posts
-
Detection bill PLD 2012 SC 371 2016 YLR 267 2016 MLD 82 2015 MLD 299 2014 YLR 2551 2011 YLR 1701 PLD 2014 Pesh 271 2014 MLD 1680 PLD 2008 La...
-
PLD 2023 SC 461 جسٹس منصور علی شاہ نے فیصلے میں لکھا کہ پرائیویسی یا نجی زندگی کا تعلق انسان کے حقِ زندگی کے ساتھ جڑا ہوا ہے، مرضی کے بغیر...
-
PLJ 2023 Lahore 896 Present : Shahid Bilal Hassan , J. MUHAMMAD YASIN--Petitioner versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL, etc.--Respondents C.R. No. 6270...
Categories
- 0. XXII
- 0.XXXIII
- 11 CPC
- 115 CPC
- 144 CPC
- 148 CPC
- 149 CPC
- 151 CPC
- 1877 (I of 1877)
- 1908
- 1910
- 1962
- 1967(XVII of 1967)
- 2012 (IV of 2012)
- 2014 (XX of 2014
- 21 CPC
- 23 CPC
- 24 CPC
- 36 CPC
- 39 CPC
- 42 CPC
- 5 CPC
- 52 CPC
- 67 CPC
- 77 CPC
- 87 QSO
- 9 CPC
- Amendment
- APPEALS REVISION
- Banking Companies Ordinance
- C.P.C.
- Cas
- Case Law with Complete Judgment
- Case Laws
- Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
- CONVERSION OF WTITS
- CPC
- CPC 88
- Defamation Ordinance (LVI of 2002)
- Document
- Draft/Application
- Duty of Court
- Electricity Act
- Fraud
- Gift
- Important Judgment
- Inherit
- Inheritance
- Islamic Law
- Limitation Act
- limitation Laws Art. 163
- Must read judgement
- New ORDINANCE
- O-1 R-10
- O. XXI
- O. XXXIII
- O.1X
- O.IX
- O.IX R.13
- O.V
- O.VII
- O.VII R.11
- O.XI Rr.14 & 16
- O.XI Rr.14 & 21
- O.XL R. 1
- O.XX R.4
- O.XXXIV .R.5
- O.XXXIX
- Oder VII Rule 11d
- Oral Gift
- ORDER 37 – RULE 1&2
- Order 9 Rule 4
- Order XXV Rule 1
- Order-14
- Order-21
- Order-39
- Order. VII Rule.11
- PLD 2021 BALOCHISTAN 172
- Pleadings
- Pre-emption Act (1 of 1913)
- Punjab Overseas Commission Act
- Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act
- QSO 79
- R . 11
- R 0. XXXIX
- R-4-A
- R. 10
- R. 8
- R.11
- R.13
- R.5
- R.6
- Rent
- Rent premises Act 2009
- Rr. 1 & 2
- Rr. 1 &2
- Rr. 15
- Rr. 5
- Rr. 7
- Rr. 97 to 103
- Rule 10
- Rule-1 & 2
- Rule-11
- Rule-2.
- Rules. 6 & 13
- SECOND APPEAL INTO REVISION
- SECTION 115
- SECTION 115.
- SECTION 12(2)
- SECTION 144 CPC
- Section 15
- SECTION 151
- SECTION 151.
- Section 17
- Section 18
- SECTION 9; O-7 R-11; BANKING ORDINANCE 1979 Sec 6(1) & (4)
- Section. 27
- SECTIONS 35 & 35-A C.P.C.
- Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)
- Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)
- Specific Relief Act
- Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)
- Ss. 39 & 52.
- Suit
- Talk of the town
- Topic
- Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)
- Video
- VII
- W.P. Land Revenue Act
- West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)
- West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967)
- West PakistanLand Revenue Act (XVII of 1967)
- West Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act (IX of 1948)
0 comments:
Post a Comment