"17. Indeed, the concurrent findings of three Courts below on a question of fact, if
not based on misreading or non-reading of evidence and not suffering from any
illegality or material irregularity effecting the merits of the case, are riot open to
question at the revisional stage, but where on record the position is contrary to it,
then the revisional Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under section 115, C.p.C. or
this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution, €.re
not denuded of their respective powers to interfere and upset such findings.
Used in Judgment of
Lahore High Court
Civil Revision
83-12
0 comments:
Post a Comment