4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent has vehemently supported the impugned judgments by contending that the respondent had proved on record all the essential ingredients of a valid gift; that execution of gift deed in favour of the respondent was in accordance with Muhammadan Law. Additionally, oral gift by a Muslim has the same validity provided its basic ingredients are fulfilled. In support of his arguments, the learned counsel has placed reliance on Abdul Ghaffar and 6 others (PLD 1975 Peshawar 12) and Maulvi Abdullah and others vs. Abdul Aziz and others (1987 SCMR 1403). Lastly, submitted that the learned Courts below have passed the decree in favour of the respondent on the basis of evidence led by the parties available on record and by exercising their power, they have not committed any illegality and irregularity amounting to wrong assumption of jurisdiction; hence the revisions petitions which are against the concurrent findings of facts are liable to be dismissed.
Part of Judgment
IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT LAHORE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENTCivil Revision
752-12
| 2017 LHC 4748 |
0 Comments