Naysaying the above submissions, the learned counsel for the respondents No.1 to 4, by favouring the impugned orders, ex parte judgment and decree, has prayed for dismissal of the writ petition in hand.

3. Naysaying the above submissions, the learned counsel for the respondents No.1 to 4, by favouring the impugned orders, ex parte judgment and decree, has prayed for dismissal of the writ petition in hand. Relies on Honda Atlas Cars (Pakistan) Ltd. v. Honda Sarhad (Pvt.) Ltd. and others (2005 SCMR 609), Shahid Pervaiz alias Shahid Hameed v. Muhammad Ahmad Ameen (2006 SCMR 631) and Secretary Education Department, Government of N.-W.F.P., Peshawar and others v. Asfandiar Khan (2008 SCMR 287). 

 Part of Judgment 

IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT LAHORE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Writ Petition-Miscellanous-Civil Suit
38404-16

2017 LHC 536