2024 MLD 1508
MUBASHAR ALI SHAH VS MUHAMMAD SHARIF
Civil Revision No 58370 of 2021
Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act, 2012
Non-impleadment of all other co-owners as defendants-Effect---No claim of mesne profit in the suit---Competency of suit-Non-appearance of petitioner himself as a witness-Effect Claim of the petitioner based on hearsay evidence---Validity---Petitioner did not implead all the co-owners in the suit, therefore, the suit was not maintainable and competent---Passing of preliminary decree in partition suit under Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act, 2012, (ACT) is not provided; therefore, without claiming mesne profit undem the Act, the suit was not competent---Deposition of PW.1& PW.2 was based on hearsay, which had also rightly been disbelieved by the lowe courts-Non-appearance of the petitioner himself in the witness box ane not making deposition on oath also went against him---Courts below ha rightly appreciated and evaluated evidence of the parties and had reache to a just conclusion, concurrently, that the petitioners had failed to prov their case by leading cogent, confidence inspiring and trustworth evidence---Concurrent findings on record could not be disturbed exercise of revisional jurisdiction under S. 115 of C.P.C---
0 Comments