especially when she
was not called upon to prove any other aspect but her defence only by
cross-examining the plaintiff’s witnesses and, therefore, no adverse
inference could be drawn against the first defendant because she did
not enter the witness-box
1 Mitti Bewa v. Daitari Nayak and others (AIR 1982 Orissa 174) &
Umesh Bondre v. Wilfred Fernandes (AIR 2007 Bombay 29)
Used in judgement of
Lahore High court
Civil Revision
2302034.3204-15
0 comments:
Post a Comment