Prescribed period of limitation and therefore, had become ineffective

Further reliance is placed on case law reported as “Ali Ahmad and another v. Muhammad Fazal and another” (1972 SCMR 322) and “Shahra and others v. Member, Board of Revenue, Punjab and others” (2004 SCMR 117), wherein it has been held that revenue authorities are under obligation to sanction mutation on basis of decree passed by civil court and cannot refuse mutation on ground that decree had not been put into execution within prescribed period of limitation and therefore, had become ineffective.

Used In Judgement of
Lahore High court
Civil Revision
1268684.2325-11

2019 LHC 239