What is provided in O. 23, R. 3

“Now this determination may be arrived in one of two ways; either after contest by the Court coming to its own conclusion on the materials placed before it, or on the parties themselves agreeing to settle their difference on certain lines and asking the Court to adjudicate their respective rights and liabilities in accordance with that settlement. In both cases the Court has to pass orders. In one case the order is based on the decision of the Court itself, and in the other the Court, after being informed of the agreement of the parties makes a formal adjudication on the basis of the agreement. In both cases the court will generally order the parties to carry out their respective obligations. An adjudication may in some cases, be purely declaratory; this will happen if a declaration be sufficient to give the party having a right all the relief he is in need of. If on the other hand, a declaration is not enough, the Court will order the party, who has infringed the right of another to restore that right to the rightful party as found by the Court, or as admitted by the other party. What the parties do in a compromise of a suit is to adjust their rights and liabilities outside the Court and then come and ask the Court to recognize those rights and liabilities and pass its formal expression of adjudication accordingly. This is what is provided in O. 23, R. 3. The Court is required to record the compromise, which thus really takes the place of a judgment in a contested suit.”

AIR 1933 Patna 306

Source
2019 LHC 1994

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.

Case Law Search