Petitioners could not point out any illegality or irregularity as well as wrong exercise of vested jurisdiction,

4. Pursuant to the above discussion, it is held that the learned counsel for the petitioners could not point out any illegality or irregularity as well as wrong exercise of vested jurisdiction, alleged committed by the learned Courts below while passing the impugned order, judgment and decrees, warranting interference by this Court. Resultantly, while placing reliance on Attiqullah v. Kafayatullah (1981 SCMR 162), Nazir Ahmad v. Mahmood Ahmad and others (1984 CLC 2658-Lahore) and Abdul Khaliq v. Gul Faraz (PLD 2011 Peshawar 112), the civil revision in hand being without any force and substance stands dismissed in limine. 

Part of judgement 
THE LAHORE HIGH COURT LAHORE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT 
Civil Revision
1820855.2124-15
2018 LHC 742

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.

Case Law Search