3. Naysaying the submissions above, the learned counsel representing the respondents has supported the impugned judgments and decrees, which have been rendered concurrently, and has further argued that at this stage the same cannot be interfered with under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 merely because different view is possible to be taken. He has prayed for dismissal of the civil revision in hand. Relies on Abdul Qayum through Legal Heirs v. Mushk-e-Alam and another (2001 SCMR 798), Muhammad Sardar and others v. Province of Punjab and others (2011 YLR 119-Lahore), Muhammad Ijaz and 2 others v. Additional District Judge, Multan District Multan and 4 others (PLJ 2011 Lahore 42) and Muhammad and others v. Mst. Khatoon and others (2013 YLR 2036-Lahore)
Part of Judgment of
LAHORE HIGH COURT, BAHAWALPUR BENCH,
BAHAWALPUR
Civil Revision652-11
| 2018 LHC 667 |
0 comments:
Post a Comment