Suit would indicate that he neither specified the date when he came about the impugned mutation nor gave any explanation tenable in law to justify condonation.

 In this respect, guideline has been sought from Lal Khan (Decd.) through His LRs. v. Muhammad Yousaf (Decd.) through His LRs. and another (NLR 2011 Revenue 65), wherein it has invariably been held by Apex Court of the Country:- 

‘27. In the case in hand, a bare look at the plaint of respondent’s suit would indicate that he neither specified the date when he came about the impugned mutation nor gave any explanation tenable in law to justify condonation. In these circumstances, the findings on issue No.4 are violative of the law declared and therefore not sustainable.’

Part of Judgment 

IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT AT LAHORE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

Civil Revision (Against Interim Order) Decree US. 115 C.P.C
1066739.2108-09

2018 LHC 285