10. The crux of the discussion above is that while
placing reliance on the judgments supra as well as judgment
reported as Muhammad Akram and another v. Altaf Ahmad
(PLD 2003 Supreme Court 688), the civil revision in hand is
accepted, impugned judgments and decrees passed by the
learned Courts below are set aside and the suit instituted by the
petitioner/plaintiff is decreed declaring the mutations No.442
dated 02.07.1961, 452 dated 10.07.1962, 482 dated 22.02.1966,
507 dated 21.01.1959 and 602 dated 19.08.1966 against law
and facts, ineffective qua the rights of the petitioner/plaintiff,
result of fraud and are cancelled, accordingly.
Part of Judgment of
LAHORE HIGH COURT, BAHAWALPUR BENCH, BAHAWALPUR
Civil Revision652-11
2018 LHC 667 |
0 comments:
Post a Comment