Revisional jurisdiction in a casual manner rather it has to be proved that the same are perverse or arbitrary or the same are based on misreading or non-reading of evidence.

15. Even otherwise, concurrent findings of facts cannot be upset by this court in its revisional jurisdiction in a casual manner rather it has to be proved that the same are perverse or arbitrary or the same are based on misreading or non-reading of evidence. In this regard, reference can safely be made to the case reported as Muhammad Idrees and others v. Muhammad Pervaiz and others (2010 SCMR 5). 

Part of Judgment 

 IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT BAHAWALPUR BENCH, BAHAWALPUR

Civil Rev. Against Decree

337-09

2017 LHC 4412