Settled principle that concurrent findings cannot be considered as inviolable

6. It is a settled principle that concurrent findings cannot be considered as inviolable and High Court is competent to interfere if such findings are based on insufficient evidence, misreading of evidence, non-consideration of material evidence, erroneous presumption of facts and consideration of inadmissible evidence; thus, the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the respondent No.1/plaintiff that this Court cannot make interference at this stage have no force and the same are discarded. Reliance is placed on Muhammad Sami v. Additional District Judge, Sargodha and 2 others (2007 SCMR 621), Muhammad Aslam v. Mst. Ferozi and others (PLD 2001 Supreme Court 213), Barkat Ali v. Muhammad Nawaz (PLD 2004 Supreme Court 489) and Dilawar Jan v. Gul Rehman and 5 others (PLD 2001 Supreme Court 149).

Part of Judgment 

IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT AT LAHORE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

Civil Revision (Against Interim Order) Decree US. 115 C.P.C
1066739.2108-09

2018 LHC 285