The August Court in a case reported as Maulana Abdul Haque
Baloch and others Vs. Government of Balochistan through
Secretary Industries and Mineral Development and others (PLD
2013 SC 641) has held as under:-
“The competent authority also failed to determine the terms
and conditions to be fixed in granting the relaxations sought
for. In this view of the matter, in absence of the requirements
of rule 98 being fulfilled in the instant case, all relaxations
were granted in excess of authority and were entirely beyond
the scope of the provisions of law, and therefore, ultra vires
the powers granted under rule 98 of BMCR 1970 read with
section 5 of the Act of 1948, and thus void. Shorn of
relaxations so grant, CHEJVA has no legal sanctity and
consequently remains an agreement entered into against the
provisions of law, hence not enforceable. All the key provisions of CHEJVA were made subject to a
reliance on relaxations that were illegal and void ab initio, the
illegality of the agreement seeps to its root. As such, no
operative part of the agreement survives to be independently
enforceable and the principle of severability cannot be applied
to save any part thereof. The agreement is, therefore, void and
unenforceable in its entirety under the law.”
Part of judgment
IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Land6747/19
2019 LHC 3711
0 comments:
Post a Comment